Economist Mao yushi (information)
we taxpayers have the right to ask , What do we pay taxes. Also the right to express what I do not want, what I want to. Despite the personal position may not be accepted by the Government, but we do have the right to express their views. Government should also fully consider the taxpayers for the use of tax requirements. Under normal conditions of the people's Congress is to discuss how taxes using the most appropriate occasion. Government to listen to people's congresses for the use of tax resolution.
I expressed here, I don't want to use my tax money to build an aircraft carrier. Of course, this is my personal opinion, not necessarily others look at it this way. I would like to explain my reasons for members ' reference.
most people seem to build aircraft carriers to the enhancement of national defense forces, is necessary. But this idea a little wishful thinking. Because it assumes that the other countries is not appropriate to build an aircraft carrier, allow China to strengthen national defense, they do not enhance their national defense force, which is justified. Because China has strengthened defence if other countries, they also strengthened their defense, the two sides strengthen arms is the effect of offsetting each other. The only remaining consequences is a waste of the respective national strength. In fact the big country is on the road in the world. Their arms expansion, offsetting each other, causing huge waste.
I is not difficult, everyone can understand. The leaders of countries not stupid, they also know how to arms expansion is no good. But why countries are in the expansion? I guess because the country's leaders to be responsible for national security of the people, if they are not arms expansion, in front of the national people's bad explanation. Although resisted expansion is in line with the interests of the people, but not easily understood by the people of the whole. Results have to participate in the arms race, harms others damaged, to the disadvantage of anyone.
March 6 this year of the reference news coverage of a little attention, but very important news. Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou announced that Taiwan does not engage in an arms race with the Mainland. The importance of this message is: first, Taiwan people are rational and know how to engage in an arms race against themselves; second, Ma Ying-jeou received Taiwan masses of the people's trust, dare to make appears to be to the disadvantage of the safety of the people, and is essentially a favourable decision. This also shows Taiwan's people and the politicians are more mature, more reasonable, rushed out of the habit of constraints, and create a new pattern of foreign relations.
if the Mainland leader Hu Jintao has decided not to engage in an arms race in, what will be the result? Probably first is opposing the military sector. It was taken away their jobs. Weapons industry to support a lot of people in China, there are huge profits, live in this sector is very nourishing, there are a large number of exports, can earn a lot of foreign exchange. Reduce arms production is clearly against them. Secondly people may not agree. China is very poor in the past, cannot afford to build an aircraft carrier, therefore being bullied. Now we have the money, with the aircraft carrier can be free from bullying, more yangwei world, this is a big country kind of style. Number of people holding such ideas, do not know. China not only has foreign has. We all think so, it can be a problem. Many countries, especially great powers, are claimed to seek hegemony, hegemony thinking is there. Always wanted their strengh and enjoyable. Small people holding such ideas will probably less.
Taiwan is a very small democracies, Ma Ying-jeou announced that no arms race in the world does not have much impact. If China, particularly the United States also announced that no arms race in, the situation will be very different. Arms expansion and disarmament which are more conducive to world peace? In the so-called nuclear equilibrium theory during the cold war. That both sides have a horrible nuclear weapons, confrontation with each other, who was not first hand, the most security. After more than 60 years of history of nuclear confrontation, you should now see the risk of it. Given there are nuclear weapons, to other nuclear-weapon-States on the one hand provides an excuse, on the inevitable proliferation of nuclear weapons. More and more countries now have nuclear weapons in the world, every possible risk is growing. If you are not eventual complete elimination of nuclear weapons, the result is likely to be a nuclear disaster. Bring lessons learn deserve our serious nuclear confrontation. Arms race does not bring peace but bring waste and the increasing risk of war.
the Chinese certainly richer than in the past, we all want their strengh. But expansion does not have access to the world's respect, can only make the world more nervous. If the led a balanced disarmament, can be admired throughout the world. Margaret Thatcher once said that the Chinese 100 years would not produce new ideas and contribute to human. She has said is right. China's leaders and all thought of Chinese will agree that China put forward ideas in disarmament, is the real contribution to humanity. China is now in position and strength of the world, made of disarmament is to let the whole world seriously. United States President Barack Obama is also a new thought leaders. Sino-US cooperation lead to balanced disarmament, is a rare opportunity, don't let gently. So I do not want to take me to pay taxes to build an aircraft carrier.
